Towards a More Robust Community

 … building a better place for all.

What is community?

The first, and most important, ingredient of community is people. A community is a group of people who share a common sense of belonging to something. That commonality is most likely a place like a neighborhood or village. Sometimes there are micro-communities that form into a community – smaller groups of people with common interests who cooperate with other groups to achieve broader goals. This is actually the most common definition of a healthy community.

Unfortunately, more often than not this does not happen. It is not that micro-communities don’t exist – these basic building blocks of human existence are everywhere. It’s just that, for a wide variety of reasons, these smaller groups do not share a common bond, vision or trust with each other and fail to develop into a broader community.

Occasionally, where community once existed, it breaks down as neighborhood demographics change over years or decades and connections fail to form between new groups and pre-existing ones. Tensions, friction and antagonism can occur as the smaller groups see themselves in competition with others. Competition for what? Competition for the basic elements of life – for fulfillment of needs and wants—for flourishing.

What is community strengthening?

Community strengthening is a sustained effort to increase involvement and partnership among as many members and smaller groups as possible in order to achieve common objectives. It involves local people, local micro-communities, community organizations, government, business and charities working together to achieve agreed social, economic and environmental benefits. You will notice that people are listed first because, again, people are the necessary ingredient in any community.

How do we approach building a stronger community?

There are two basic approaches to community strengthening—top-down and bottom-up. These are not necessarily exclusive of each other.

Top-down approaches rely on an official or dominant entity (like local government or corporations) to take command and decide how to engage people in the task of community building. This, many times, results in gentrification or ‘cleaning up” a neighborhood.

Bottom-up approaches begin at the initiative of the local people and smaller groups. These involve activities that enable individuals to participate in the life of the community and take part in priority setting and decision making to influence and shape their local community. This is often called grassroots organizing. When the bottom-up approach is used, it is entirely possible that the community can influence local government and other civic entities to work towards the community’s goals. It takes numbers, effort and some organization, but is entirely possible.

How do we build trust between different micro-communities?

We meet. We engage. We talk. We strive to overcome what seem like natural boundaries in order to find common ground.

What do apartment renters and home owners have in common? What do young and old have in common? What do people of different ethnicities have in common? We all need to thrive. Unfortunately, in the sheer effort to simply survive, we lose sight of the need to thrive. So, what do we all have in common? The need to thrive, to flourish and to provide opportunities and access for well-being.

That’s some mighty powerful common ground. When we compete for the opportunity to have more, we use resources against each other. When we cooperate, we get to use all our resources and assets together to work for the common good. And, again, the most important asset is the imagination, effort and resolve of people—of you.

Several things are needed to provide a place in which we each can listen to our neighbors—especially those who are not accustomed to having a voice—not the least is the willingness to take risk. The first risk is, of course, that no-one will pay any attention or be interested in participating. I am willing to take that risk—I can accept my fear of failure.

Another risk is that we may not be willing to examine the possibilities and dare to dream. It doesn’t take a majority to make something like this happen, just a willing few. Margaret Mead said, “never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Martin Luther King Jr. dreamed about the “beloved community” and risked all for it. What about us?

Another risk is that, if people in the community do participate, some may not like what they have to say. Actually, I would suggest this isn’t a risk at all—it is a given. We will not always like what we hear or share with each other. We may need to be willing to write with sensitivity and compassionate, but we should carefully avoid anything like censorship or appeasement.

Ultimately, I would like to suggest that this blog be one way of providing community – that is, that it strives to make communication more open between community members. Conditions placed on content are, by their very nature, exclusive. When we start asking, “who or what can be included”, we are really asking who or what should be excluded. Inclusion is open and welcoming– caution, while necessary in small doses, presents something of a hurdle to us. This, my friends, is risky business.

So, will you join in the risky business of expressing yourself. Will you share your stories with each other? Come meet together. We can talk about your vision of community. How about expressing yourself by writing a story for this blog? Let’s join our voices together so that all may thrive!

You can e-mail me at aj.little@yahoo.com.

0 Responses to “Towards a More Robust Community”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


That's too bad - I'm so sorry. Oh, well, just try to make the best of it. What you'll find here is a variety of essays and ramblings to do with things theological, social, whimsical and, sometimes, all three. I don't write to get famous - trust me, I've been told how futile that would be - but to express myself. I love to communicate and browbeat - ummm, I mean dialogue - about the things I find intriguing. Since you're here, and the door's locked, why don't you stay a while. There's a page bar under the header with links to information about us - I mean me. Don't forget to tell me what you think - in a nice way, I mean.

Readers since Jan 2009

  • 133,901 posts read


%d bloggers like this: